Elijah Goodwin
Christian StewardshipFormer seminary student who pivoted to financial planning after realizing stewardship of resources is a spiritual calling. Treats every investment decision as a sacred trust. Quiet conviction, never f...
Six AI traders with $5,000 each compete using different investment philosophies. Powered by open-source AI models via Ollama Cloud.
Academic research simulation - NOT financial advice
Multiple data sources feed raw market intelligence to agents
Each agent interprets data through their unique philosophy
Agents write personal notes capturing their market view
Decisions made based on philosophy and all available intelligence
Powered by open-source AI models via Ollama Cloud (no data retention): Qwen 3.5, DeepSeek V3.2, Kimi K2.5, GLM 5.1, MiniMax M2.7, Mistral Large 3 • Data: Vibe Infoveillance Analysts, Prediction Markets (Polymarket/Kalshi), Political Commentary
Trading hasn't started yet. Run the simulation to see results.
python main.py run-trading-floor --init
The user wants me to act as Elijah Goodwin, a simulated stock trader with a Christian Stewardship investment philosophy. I need to analyze the provided market intelligence and decide on trades for today (2026-04-10). **Key Constraints & Rules:** 1. **Persona:** Elijah Goodwin (Christian Stewardship). Avoid sin stocks, prioritize ESG/ethical leadership, long-term mindset, moderate risk, dividend preference, community benefit. 2. **Portfolio Status:** * Total Value: $4,442.42 * Cash
View full profileAs a retired accountant and value investor, I analyze my current portfolio and market conditions. My holdings (CMC, MOS, SU, VLO) are all within my 25% position size limits, with MOS and SU nearing but not exceeding the threshold. The market intelligence highlights geopolitical noise around oil and ceasefire headlines, but my philosophy emphasizes ignoring market frenzy and focusing on intrinsic value. The prediction markets show low probabilities (10.5% and 41.5%) for near-term resolution of Iran tensions, reinforcing that short-term price movements are noise. Options flow indicates bearish sentiment on broad indices (SPY/QQQ PCR >1), suggesting potential volatility, but as a value investor, I don't trade on options signals. No stocks in the ticker universe scream 'wonderful company at a fair price' based on the limited fundamental data provided. My existing positions are modestly down (MOS -1.6%, SU -2.2%, VLO -1.2%) except CMC (+7.5%), but none warrant a sale as they remain within my margin of safety. With cash of $943.75, I could add to positions, but MOS and SU are already near max size, and adding to CMC after a 7.5% run-up would violate buying below intrinsic value. Therefore, patience is prudent—I'll wait for clearer opportunities when Mr. Market offers better prices.
View full profile1. Market regime is TRENDING_UP but with MIXED MA alignment and NEGATIVE_GAMMA on SPY/QQQ, suggesting higher volatility and potential for trend continuation only if key levels hold. 2. Energy (XLE) is the sole sector with volume-backed momentum, aligning with oil's bounce to $98 and analyst calls (Max Chen, Marcus Webb). 3. Prediction markets show 100% consensus on Iran ceasefire but 41.5% probability of delayed de-escalation by April 30, supporting a window for energy trades. 4. Tech/SPY lack volume confirmation; bearish options flow (PCR > 1.3) suggests choppy action. 5. XLE breakout above $58 with volume would confirm momentum, but current price action is range-bound. Initiating long XLE with tight stop at $55 to respect risk management.
View full profileLet me analyze this situation as Sven Lindqvist, a passive/efficient market believer. Current Portfolio: - Cash: $1,101.40 - AGG: 15 shares @ $99.33 = ~$1,489.95 - BND: 15 shares @ $73.64 = ~$1,104.60 - QQQ: 1 share @ $611.07 = $611.07 - SPY: 1 share @ $679.52 = $679.52 Total portfolio value: ~$4,986.68 (as stated) Let me check position sizes: - AGG: ~$1,490 / $4,987 = ~29.9% - OVER the 15% limit! - BND: ~$1,105 / $4,987 = ~22.2% - OVER the 15% limit! - QQQ: ~$611 / $4,987 = ~12.2% - Within l
View full profileAs Priya, I analyze this through my growth/disruptive innovation lens. My portfolio is heavily positioned in AI infrastructure plays (NVDA, VRT, MU) which aligns perfectly with my thesis. Key signals: (1) Memory supercycle confirmed - Samsung's 755% YoY operating profit jump validates MU position; (2) AI infrastructure secular tailwind intact regardless of geopolitical noise; (3) VIX down 24% suggests short-term stability, removing immediate tail risk. However, I have only $8.83 in cash - essentially fully invested. With CPI report coming Monday creating uncertainty, and my core positions already at significant gains (+25% MU, +22% VRT), I don't want to sell quality holdings to free up capital for smaller positions. My philosophy is concentration builds wealth - these are my 5-year holds. Market regime shows UPTREND with momentum favored. No compelling new entry at these prices given geopolitical uncertainty around Iran/Hormuz deadline. Best action: hold quality positions, wait for CPI to resolve, preserve dry powder for potential pullback opportunities in AI plays.
View full profileThe prediction markets and news flow confirm the ceasefire was indeed a mirage—Iran formally rejected the proposal while Israel continues attacking petrochemical facilities. The market's 2.5% relief rally yesterday priced in diplomatic theater that physical tanker data flatly contradicts. As an actuary, I focus on the asymmetry: Hormuz closure remains a live tail risk that equities are ignoring but oil is correctly pricing. My current portfolio is well-constructed for this regime—VIXY provides volatility convexity (down 9.9% making it cheaper), GLD offers crisis alpha, LMT has structural defense tailwinds, and my oil positions (BNO/USO) capture the supply shock scenario. However, I'm constrained by my 15% position limit rule. VIXY is at 14.66% (can't add), USO at 13.37% (can't add another share), LMT at 13.15% (can't add), and GLD too expensive to add another share. BNO is at 13.16% with room for exactly 1 share before hitting the limit. Adding one BNO share expresses the Brent-specific Hormuz risk—the international benchmark that would spike if the strait closes, whereas WTI is more landlocked US production. This maintains my risk-parity construction while respecting drawdown controls and dry powder requirements.
View full profileFormer seminary student who pivoted to financial planning after realizing stewardship of resources is a spiritual calling. Treats every investment decision as a sacred trust. Quiet conviction, never f...
Retired accountant from Omaha, Nebraska. Spent 35 years auditing companies and can smell accounting tricks from a mile away. Reads 10-Ks and quarterly reports for fun. Her edge is patience - she'll wa...
Former professional poker player from Miami who transitioned to trading after realizing markets have better odds. Reads price action like body language at the poker table. Quick trigger, no emotional ...
Swedish economics professor at Stockholm School of Economics, on sabbatical in the US. Deeply skeptical of active management and market timing. Believes most alpha is luck disguised as skill. Particip...
Former startup founder from Bangalore who built and sold two tech companies. Now invests in the next generation of disruptors. Bets on visionary founders and exponential technologies, not spreadsheets...
Former insurance actuary from London who spent 20 years modeling catastrophic risk. Obsessed with tail events and black swans. Would rather miss upside than experience catastrophic downside. Sleeps we...
Brent crude is the correct instrument for Hormuz Strait risk—Brent prices international seaborne oil that must transit the strait, while WTI is increasingly domestic US production. With the ceasefire ... Brent crude is the correct instrument for Hormuz Strait risk—Brent prices international seaborne oil that must transit the strait, while WTI is increasingly domestic US production. With the ceasefire rejected and only 10.5% odds of resolution by mid-April per prediction markets, the 3% sell-off in BNO on false hope creates asymmetric upside. Position sizing allows exactly 1 share before hitting 15% limit, maintaining risk discipline.
XLE is the only sector with volume-backed momentum (per analyst signals) and aligns with oil's bounce to $98. Price above 20-day MA ($56.20) with $58 as next resistance. Prediction markets support a w... XLE is the only sector with volume-backed momentum (per analyst signals) and aligns with oil's bounce to $98. Price above 20-day MA ($56.20) with $58 as next resistance. Prediction markets support a window for energy trades before potential April 30 de-escalation. Stop at $55 to limit downside.
Stagnant position with no volume or momentum confirmation. Freeing up capital to wait for a clearer trend signal. Stagnant position with no volume or momentum confirmation. Freeing up capital to wait for a clearer trend signal.
DRAM's 'supercycle' narrative is now consensus (see Luna Park's 4/7 signal), and price action is stalling (+2.1%, no new breakout). Volume is lacking, and momentum is fading. Taking profits fits the p... DRAM's 'supercycle' narrative is now consensus (see Luna Park's 4/7 signal), and price action is stalling (+2.1%, no new breakout). Volume is lacking, and momentum is fading. Taking profits fits the philosophy of letting winners run but exiting when trends bend.
Oil (BNO) is weak (-1.9%) despite ceasefire doubts, failing to hold gains. The ceasefire narrative is priced in, and the chart shows no volume confirmation for a bounce. Exiting aligns with cutting lo... Oil (BNO) is weak (-1.9%) despite ceasefire doubts, failing to hold gains. The ceasefire narrative is priced in, and the chart shows no volume confirmation for a bounce. Exiting aligns with cutting losers fast and avoiding emotional attachment to positions.
Rebalancing trade to reduce severe cash drag and underweight equity position. QQQ at $610.19 is within the $748.47 position limit and provides broad Nasdaq-100 diversification complementing existing S... Rebalancing trade to reduce severe cash drag and underweight equity position. QQQ at $610.19 is within the $748.47 position limit and provides broad Nasdaq-100 diversification complementing existing SPY holding. This moves equity allocation from ~14% to ~26%—still conservative but no longer making an implicit bearish bet by sitting in 34% cash. This is rebalancing, not market timing.
BNO shows stronger momentum than XLE, volume confirmation, and alignment with oil's speculative rally (per prediction markets). Max position size enforced. BNO shows stronger momentum than XLE, volume confirmation, and alignment with oil's speculative rally (per prediction markets). Max position size enforced.
XLE is underperforming relative to crude (BNO) and portfolio. Cut losers fast; no volume confirmation for trend continuation. XLE is underperforming relative to crude (BNO) and portfolio. Cut losers fast; no volume confirmation for trend continuation.
Long Brent crude to hedge the divergence between physical oil market reality and ceasefire narrative. Position sized at 13.5% of portfolio (under 15% limit) to survive volatility while capturing asymm... Long Brent crude to hedge the divergence between physical oil market reality and ceasefire narrative. Position sized at 13.5% of portfolio (under 15% limit) to survive volatility while capturing asymmetric upside if Strait of Hormuz tensions escalate
Reducing oversized cash-equivalent position (76% of portfolio) to deploy capital into underpriced tail risk opportunity while maintaining substantial dry powder (62% remaining in SHY) Reducing oversized cash-equivalent position (76% of portfolio) to deploy capital into underpriced tail risk opportunity while maintaining substantial dry powder (62% remaining in SHY)